Outsourcing Software Jobs: Can You Really Profit?

Outsourcing your software jobs can be profitable, even if you think otherwise. Some people think that outsourcing is a last resort when it comes to running a business while still making a profit. In the software industry, outsourcing is very popular for a number of reasons. The first reason they outsource is because technology is continually evolving and outsourcing software jobs to programmers or software firms gives businesses more flexibility they won’t have if they depend solely on inhouse employees. In this way, they can offer clients a wider range of services anchored on the skills of the outsource contractors. By outsourcing some software jobs, companies can use their inhouse manpower to focus on a few skill sets, while getting contractors to take care of specialized needs.

Let us take a closer look at how outsourcing software jobs can be profitable. As I stated earlier, outsourcing software jobs boosts versatility. Because technology is changing and software program and applications are always evolving, keeping inhouse staff or employees as much as date with these trends and adjustments could be pricey and cumbersome. Inhouse employees such as developers, programmers and designers may end up spending more time learning and training than performing their jobs and living up to due dates. Also, the business might even miss lucrative opportunities and contracts if none of the staff has the required skills to meet what’s needed.

To seal this gap in the software program company’s manpower and abilities set, outsourcing jobs to freelances or contractors is a practical answer. Simply because clients can demand a lot of functions, it’s important that the software business can meet these demands if they need skills and experience which the inhouse employees have. This means repeat company and also new business offers gained because the software program business can now pursue projects having a team of skilled employees and outsourced talent backing it.

Another benefit of outsourcing software jobs is that it allows the company to allot time to train their inhouse employees such as developers, designers and programmers, which also benefits the employees since they become more marketable. While the inhouse staff is under training on new software and technologies, the company can ask their freelancers and contractors to cover some of the jobs and projects. This way, the software company can still meet its deadlines even if some employees are out on training.

With additional manpower due to outsourcing, a software company or outfit now has more flexibility to get more business and maintain clients satisfied, resulting in much more profitability. By outsourcing software program jobs, the business now has the luxury of having the specialists in different technologies with out the need to hire them as normal employees. This benefit could be observed by smaller businesses who wish to pursue bigger projects. Although small companies might have years of experience with smaller projects, they may not have the encounter and manpower to take on a larger projects. By outsourcing software program jobs, a little company will surely have the confidence of going following larger projects which have a higher rate of earnings.

May this article help you make more profits by outsourcing software jobs.

Before outsourcing software jobs , be sure to checkout outsourcing advantages .
 
 

Influence of Slavery on Political and Economic Development in the United States From 1619-1865

The institution of slavery has played an important role in history of the United States until the abolishment of slavery in 1865. Slaves were common in both Southern and Northern states from the arrival of first African slaves in 1619 throughout the colonial era as well as much of the 19th century. With an aim to win the Southern states, the United States Constitution of 1788 recognized the institution of slavery by allowing each state to regulate slavery within its borders.

Despite the fact that slaves were found in both Southern and Northern states, slaves never exceeded more than 5% of total population in the North. In the South, on the other hand, slaves have reached 10% of total population by 1680 and the number of slaves continued to rise even after the Northern states started to abolish slavery at the beginning of the 19th century. Why slavery in the North was never as widespread as in the South is not fully understood but the increased demand for cotton in Europe and invention of the cotton gin at the end of the 18th century undoubtedly greatly influenced the demand for slaves in Southern states. The cotton gin enabled production of larger quantities of cotton which in turn required a larger labor force - slaves. By 1860, slaves have exceeded 30% of total population in the South.

The South's economic growth in the 18th and 19th century was on the level of other wealthy countries but the slave states remained rural and could not compare with industrialized North which also had a higher rate of population growth due to European immigrants. The birth rate in the South was comparable to that in the North but the South had fewer cities and industry which is why the vast majority of European immigrants settled in the North rather than in South. This has resulted in gradual loss of Southern influence in the federal government and subsequently the tool to implement its interests.

The frustration of the South over losing control in federal institutions, and emergence of abolitionist movement and fear from the "Slave Power Conspiracy" in the North has caused serious political tensions among the free states and slave states that resulted in the collapse of the old Second Party System and the American Civil War. However, slavery issue was not only the root cause of the American Civil War but also played a major role in the outcome of the bloodiest war on the American soil. It was the institution of slavery that prevented the South to industrialize as quickly as the North which has turned out to be one of the main reasons for the South's defeat, especially when it become clear that "King Corn" is more important to European powers than "King Cotton".

Isaac Vusterly is constantly updating his world history online [http://www.worldhistoryonline.org/] website where you can read more about American history [http://www.worldhistoryonline.org/american-history/] and other interesting historical topics.

By Isaac Vusterly

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/expert/Isaac_Vusterly/835513 Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/5686028